[needs packaging] dvdstyler

Thank you for taking the time to request this package and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately you have not provided enough information for a developer to start packaging this application. Please make sure this bug meets the guidelines at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages. An example of a complete package request is available at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages/ExamplePackageRequest.

Version 3.1-0 in PPA : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuhandbook1/+archive/ubuntu/dvdstyler

Thank you, I updated my request.

I took the liberty of adjusting the tags to the official one.

Looking at the publishing history [1] it looks like one of the reasons why this package was originally removed from Ubuntu was because it used older libraries. Do you know whether this has been resolved?

[1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvdstyler/+publishinghistory

No, I don't know. I'm using the PPA but it's an old version of DVDStyler (3.1-0).

*** This is an automated message ***

This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug reports specification, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-packaging bug reports have Wishlist importance. Subsequently, I'm setting this bug's status to Wishlist.

I found this too : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvdstyler/+bug/105653

With regards to bug 105653, dvdstyler was in the archive at some point, but was removed. Likely, it was introduced in Debian and auto-synced, but then removed from Debian and subsequently removed from Ubuntu.

Have you done a request for packaging in Debian? If you did that, and someone packages it (including yourself) and it is uploaded, then it would be almost automatically included in Ubuntu.

No, I don't know how to do that.

With regard to Debian, the Request For Packaging process is described here: https://wiki.debian.org/RFP

Please bear in mind, though, that nearly all packages are created by volunteers which need to take time out of their day to do these. Therefore, you're more likely to get an application packaged by putting in the work and learning how to do it yourself. There are people that can help you along the way, but again they'd be volunteering their time.

So, if you really want this application packaged for inclusion in Debian and/or Ubuntu, I highly recommend putting in the time and learning how to do it yourself. When you do that, you'll find people are more willing to sponsor your work into the archives and perhaps even help maintain it.

Bear in mind also that this bug report is not the place for that. You can find help for this process at https://packaging.ubuntu.com/ .

I posted a Debian RFP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019978

>I posted a Debian RFP

Nice, I've marked it as also affecting so this issue should be notified whenever something happens with the Debian report.

Unfortunately, that RFP was closed as a duplicate of the previous 10+ year old RFP/ITP, so it needs to be tracked there.

The old RFP that is still opened: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019978

Aarrrghhh, sorry, my bad. I wanted to write :

The old RFP that is still opened: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635516

InfoLibre,

This means that nobody is interested in packaging it or has the time. Moreover, nobody actually gets paid to do it. If you're that passionate about getting it packaged, then you should probably learn how to package and do it yourself and have it sponsored.

I'd like but I don't enough time to do it. I can just sometimes take time to do bug reports.