juju show-machines should show all addresses a machine has
Bug #1602840 reported by
Andrew McDermott
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canonical Juju |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Mick Gregg |
Bug Description
Running juju status only lists a single address that a machine has. We should either expand 'status' or 'show-machines' to list all addresses that a machine has or provide a more network-centric view of the machine. Without this it is very difficult to either debug issues on multi-NIC setups.
Changed in juju-core: | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
tags: | added: status usability |
summary: |
- juju status (or equivalent) should show all addresses a machine has + juju show-machines should show all addresses a machine has |
tags: | added: 2.0 |
Changed in juju-core: | |
milestone: | none → 2.0.0 |
affects: | juju-core → juju |
Changed in juju: | |
milestone: | 2.0.0 → none |
milestone: | none → 2.0.0 |
Changed in juju: | |
milestone: | 2.0.0 → 2.0-rc1 |
assignee: | nobody → Richard Harding (rharding) |
Changed in juju: | |
milestone: | 2.0-rc1 → 2.0-rc2 |
Changed in juju: | |
milestone: | 2.0-rc2 → 2.0.0 |
tags: | added: teamb |
tags: |
added: rteam removed: teamb |
Changed in juju: | |
milestone: | 2.0.0 → 2.0.1 |
Changed in juju: | |
assignee: | Richard Harding (rharding) → Mick Gregg (macgreagoir) |
Changed in juju: | |
status: | Triaged → In Progress |
Changed in juju: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
Changed in juju: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
The addresses are too many for normal tabular status output. I'm fine with listing them all in the show-machine output for a specific machine.
If we want something specific to debugging network overview across machines we should look at building those into the spaces commands that provide that type of summary overview.
What else, besides the networking addresses do we have from a network standpoint that would make sense to add into the output of show-machine? Maybe we need a specific network section in that doc output?