Low data rates with Ralink RT2500 PCI WLAN card
Bug #154524 reported by
Tamas Varga
This bug report is a duplicate of:
Bug #134660: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy.
Edit
Remove
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
linux (Ubuntu) |
Incomplete
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
After upgrading from Feisty to Gutsy my network connection seemed to be very slow. After some measurements, I realized, that my yesterday at least 10 Mbps WLAN connection speed is reduced to about 500- 600 kbps. I made measurements with my girlfriend's computer, and it worked well, so I do think that the problem is located within the rt2x00 drivers.
To post a comment you must log in.
I made some additional measurements:
If I generate downstream traffic with the maximal reachable bandwidth, and I simultaneously ping my router, I see, that the round trip time of ping is increased by a factor greater than a hundred.
Here's a snippet of ping output:
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=58 ttl=255 time=206 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=59 ttl=255 time=171 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=60 ttl=255 time=142 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=61 ttl=255 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=62 ttl=255 time=531 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=63 ttl=255 time=147 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=64 ttl=255 time=264 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=65 ttl=255 time=281 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=66 ttl=255 time=175 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=67 ttl=255 time=493 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=68 ttl=255 time=315 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=69 ttl=255 time=2.16 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=70 ttl=255 time=1.14 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=71 ttl=255 time=1.06 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=72 ttl=255 time=1.60 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=73 ttl=255 time=2.16 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=74 ttl=255 time=1.52 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=75 ttl=255 time=2.81 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=76 ttl=255 time=2.27 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=77 ttl=255 time=1.56 ms
If I generate upstream traffic (which is not slower than with the former Ubuntu-shipped driver, rt2500), there's only a slight difference in ping times (e.g.: 1- 2 ms => 2- 4 ms).