Use hardware manifest to determine touchscreen availablility
Bug #1508297 reported by
Po-Hsu Lin
This bug affects 3 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical Driver Test Suite |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Po-Hsu Lin | ||
| Checkbox Provider - Base |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Po-Hsu Lin | ||
| OEM QA Checkbox additions |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
| Provider for Plainbox - Canonical Certification (Legacy) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Po-Hsu Lin | ||
Bug Description
The automated touchscreen detection job sometimes will generate false-positive results, it will be more reliable to ask test whether the system has a touchscreen (see duplicated bugs).
Therefore the following touchscreen detection related job needs to be removed from the CDTS / Certification / OEM provider
- touchscreen/
- touchscreen/
- touchscreen/
And we need to change the Checkbox provider for the use in hardware manifest.
Related branches
lp://staging/~cypressyew/cdts/touchscreen-use-manifest
- Sylvain Pineau (community): Approve
-
Diff: 20 lines (+1/-3)1 file modifiedplainbox-provider-canonical-driver-test-suite/units/ihv-touch.pxu (+1/-3)
lp://staging/~cypressyew/checkbox/use-touchscreen-manifest
- Sylvain Pineau (community): Approve
-
Diff: 105 lines (+23/-8)2 files modifiedproviders/plainbox-provider-checkbox/jobs/suspend.txt.in (+2/-0)
providers/plainbox-provider-checkbox/jobs/touchscreen.txt.in (+21/-8)
| Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
| status: | New → In Progress |
| Changed in cdts: | |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
| Changed in plainbox-provider-canonical-certification: | |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
| Changed in oem-qa-checkbox: | |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
| Changed in cdts: | |
| status: | New → In Progress |
| assignee: | nobody → Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) |
| Changed in plainbox-provider-canonical-certification: | |
| status: | New → In Progress |
| assignee: | nobody → Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) |
| Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
| milestone: | 0.23 → none |
Revision history for this message
| Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in oem-qa-checkbox: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
Revision history for this message
| Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
| milestone: | none → 0.23 |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in oem-qa-checkbox: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Pierre Equoy (pierre-equoy) |
| status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
| Changed in plainbox-provider-canonical-certification: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in cdts: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in plainbox-provider-canonical-certification: | |
| milestone: | none → 0.20 |
| Changed in oem-qa-checkbox: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in cdts: | |
| milestone: | none → 1.12 |
| Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
| Changed in plainbox-provider-canonical-certification: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
| Changed in oem-qa-checkbox: | |
| assignee: | Pierre Equoy (pierre-equoy) → nobody |
| Changed in oem-qa-checkbox: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
| Changed in cdts: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
Please refer to this MR for the change in the Certification provider:
https:/