python-docutils fails to build in trusty with python 2.7.9
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Python |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
python2.7 (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
python2.7 (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
seen in a test rebuild with python 2.7.9
https:/
=======
ERROR: test_invalid_
-------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/build/
result = publish_
File "/build/
settings_
File "/build/
enable_
File "/build/
output = pub.publish(
File "/build/
output = self.writer.
File "/build/
self.
File "/build/
self.
File "/build/
if child.walkabout
File "/build/
if child.walkabout
File "/build/
visitor.
File "/build/
return method(node)
File "/build/
col_num, line_num, node.astext())
TypeError: %d format: a number is required, not NoneType
-------
Ran 1239 tests in 6.543s
FAILED (errors=1)
Elapsed time: 7.075 seconds
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 123
Changed in python: | |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in python-docutils (Debian): | |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in python: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in python-docutils (Debian): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
affects: | python-docutils (Debian) → python2.7 (Debian) |
affects: | python-docutils (Ubuntu) → python2.7 (Ubuntu) |
Changed in python2.7 (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Released |
Yay for breaking compatibility! Anyway, confirmed, I will try to look at this.