Licensing is inconsistent
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
juju-core |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Ian Booth | ||
1.20 |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Ian Booth |
Bug Description
In 1.20.7, I see the following licensing inconsistencies. These are, AIUI, permissible, and not a problem, but you may want to align them with everything else for consistency. If all copyright holders (everyone who has contributed to these files, or signed the CLA so Canonical can make a decision for them) agree, then you can change the licence to match the AGPL-3 like everything else.
These are licensed under the LGPL-3:
src/github.
src/github.
src/github.
src/github.
src/github.
For completeness, I note that src/github.
Changed in juju-core: | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
milestone: | none → 1.20.8 |
status: | New → Triaged |
tags: | added: tech |
Changed in juju-core: | |
milestone: | 1.20.8 → 1.21-alpha2 |
Changed in juju-core: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
tags: |
added: tech-debt removed: tech |
Changed in juju-core: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
The shell script src/github. com/juju/ juju/etc/ bash_completion .d/juju- core should stay as GPLv3 - it doesn't make any sense for that to be AGPL.