Ubuntu
unity package

compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in memmove()

Bug #1049831 reported by NeoSting on 2012-09-12

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #927168: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in memmove() from drisw_update_tex_buffer() from dri_set_tex_buffer2() from drisw_bind_tex_image() from __glXBindTexImageEXT() from TfpTexture::enable() from enableFragmentOperationsAndDrawGeometry(). Edit Remove

10

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	unity (Ubuntu)	Confirmed	Medium	Unassigned

Bug Description

in VirtualBox with 128Mo 3D memory. Fresh install, just opening somme windows.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: unity 6.4.0-0ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-14.16-generic 3.5.3
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-14-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.5.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Sep 12 15:43:35 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha amd64 (20120912)
ProcCmdline: compiz
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
Segfault happened at: 0x7f3ce685fba0: movdqu -0x10(%rsi,%rdx,1),%xmm0
PC (0x7f3ce685fba0) ok
source "-0x10(%rsi,%rdx,1)" (0x47d11cd0) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
destination "%xmm0" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: unity
StacktraceTop:
?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/swrast_dri.so
?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/swrast_dri.so
TfpTexture::bindTexImage(unsigned long const&) () from /usr/lib/compiz/libopengl.so
TfpTexture::enable(GLTexture::Filter) () from /usr/lib/compiz/libopengl.so
Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in TfpTexture::bindTexImage()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Tags:

Revision history for this message

NeoSting (neosting-web) wrote on 2012-09-12:

#1

Dependencies.txt Edit (23.4 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Disassembly.txt Edit (679 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcMaps.txt Edit (78.6 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcStatus.txt Edit (812 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Registers.txt Edit (773 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Stacktrace.txt Edit (6.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (11.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
XsessionErrors.txt Edit (5.6 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-09-12:

#2

StacktraceTop:
memmove (__len=82539200, __src=<optimized out>, __dest=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string3.h:58
drisw_update_tex_buffer (drawable=<optimized out>, ctx=<optimized out>, res=<optimized out>) at drisw.c:272
dri_set_tex_buffer2 (pDRICtx=<optimized out>, target=3553, format=8410, dPriv=<optimized out>) at dri_drawable.c:234
TfpTexture::bindTexImage (this=this@entry=0xe1bf210, glxPixmap=@0xe1bf240: 14682022) at /build/buildd/compiz-0.9.8.0/plugins/opengl/src/texture.cpp:574
TfpTexture::enable (this=0xe1bf210, filter=GLTexture::Good) at /build/buildd/compiz-0.9.8.0/plugins/opengl/src/texture.cpp:741

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-09-12: Stacktrace.txt

#3

Stacktrace.txt Edit (14.9 KiB, text/plain)

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-09-12: StacktraceSource.txt

#4

StacktraceSource.txt Edit (11.3 KiB, text/plain)

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-09-12: ThreadStacktrace.txt

#5

ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (24.8 KiB, text/plain)

Changed in unity (Ubuntu):
importance:	Undecided → Medium
summary:	- compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in TfpTexture::bindTexImage() + compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in memmove()
tags:	removed: need-amd64-retrace

Revision history for this message

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote on 2012-09-12:

#6

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in unity (Ubuntu):
status:	New → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

Omer Akram (om26er) wrote on 2012-09-12:

#7

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 927168, so is being marked as such. Any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility:

private → public

Report a bug

This report contains Public information

Everyone can see this information.

Duplicate of bug #927168 Remove

You are

Subscribing...

Edit bug mail

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.