Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:19:02PM -0000, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>>We could certainly try that. I have the impression that extended
>>attributes are rather fragile, though. If even one of the programs you
>>regularly use doesn't respect extended attributes, then the whole thing
>>doesn't work.
>
> It'll only break if one of those programs does weird things moving
> files around.
But everyone does the create/rename update dance: Microsoft Word, Vim,
bzr, you name it. Are you saying all of these apps take care to
preserve extended attributes?
> Extended attributes are getting more important, at least in the
> Windows world so people will be complaining about applications that
> break ea's.
Well, bzr breaks ea's and so far no one's complained...
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:19:02PM -0000, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>>We could certainly try that. I have the impression that extended
>>attributes are rather fragile, though. If even one of the programs you
>>regularly use doesn't respect extended attributes, then the whole thing
>>doesn't work.
>
> It'll only break if one of those programs does weird things moving
> files around.
But everyone does the create/rename update dance: Microsoft Word, Vim,
bzr, you name it. Are you saying all of these apps take care to
preserve extended attributes?
> Extended attributes are getting more important, at least in the
> Windows world so people will be complaining about applications that
> break ea's.
Well, bzr breaks ea's and so far no one's complained...
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://
iD8DBQFEvn9C0F+ nu1YWqI0RAnSaAJ 4lT61T7UWom0Fqq n4xiP4oYaLMbwCg hPKU tVjW9GVE=
Aa2wfgRTSGKi69y
=YlDL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----