Comment 18 for bug 109114
Revision history for this message
| Jan Danielsson (jan.m.danielsson) wrote | #18 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
9199653
demo site
(Get the code!)
I may want to protest that my bug report has been marked a dupe, and that it now refers to this bug. Or I want someone to tell me that they in fact are two sides of the same coin. :)
In my bug the problem was related to very many small files/directories. But this bug specifically mentions: "Fixing this bug requires some sort of fragmentation capacity when large files are detected.". No large files are involved in my case.
In my original bug-report I included an entire user session which could be used to replicate the problem. It entails checking out the netbsd source code, then runing "bzr init", "bzr add" and "bzr commit". If you check the source tree, you'll find no large files at all. But there are _many_ directories and files.
With this information in minde -- is the duplification still valid?