Activity log for bug #82510

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2007-01-31 17:41:56 Caroline Ford bug added bug
2007-02-08 19:38:08 Caroline Ford tuxpaint: assignee secretlondon
2007-02-08 19:38:08 Caroline Ford tuxpaint: statusexplanation Assigning to me to fix. I'll make a patch anyway.
2007-02-08 23:01:47 Simon Law tuxpaint: status Unconfirmed Confirmed
2007-02-08 23:01:47 Simon Law tuxpaint: importance Undecided Low
2007-02-08 23:01:47 Simon Law tuxpaint: statusexplanation Assigning to me to fix. I'll make a patch anyway. Actually, tuxpaint-data should Recommends: tuxpaint-stamps-default | tuxpaint-stamps, as we discussed online.
2007-06-22 22:53:36 LaserJock tuxpaint: status Confirmed Incomplete
2007-06-22 22:53:36 LaserJock tuxpaint: statusexplanation Actually, tuxpaint-data should Recommends: tuxpaint-stamps-default | tuxpaint-stamps, as we discussed online. Caroline, are you still working on this? Is this still an issue in gutsy?
2007-12-14 22:41:18 Mantas Kriaučiūnas bug assigned to tuxpaint (Baltix)
2007-12-18 21:55:18 Caroline Ford title [Edgy]tuxpaint not installable using gdebi [Edgy]tuxpaint should recommend stamps not depend on them
2007-12-18 21:57:00 Caroline Ford bug assigned to tuxpaint (Debian)
2008-03-08 03:37:45 Caroline Ford bug added attachment 'tuxpaint-stamps_2007.07.01-1ubuntu2.debdiff' (debdiff to remove tuxpaint-data as a dependency)
2008-03-08 03:38:14 Caroline Ford tuxpaint: status Incomplete Confirmed
2008-03-08 03:39:28 Caroline Ford tuxpaint: assignee secretlondon
2008-03-08 03:45:26 Caroline Ford description Binary package hint: tuxpaint tuxpaint-data_0.9.15b-3ubuntu1_all.deb tuxpaint-stamps-default_2005.11.25-1ubuntu2_all.deb tuxpaint-data depends upon tuxpaint-stamps, and vice versa. This means that tuxpaint cannot be installed using gdebi as it will not allow one package to be installed without the other having been previously installed. (I can't test with synaptic as I don't have a linux box with net access) -------- tuxpaint-stamps-default_2005.11.25-1ubuntu2_all.deb depends upon tuxpaint-data (>= 2002.09.25) tuxpaint-data depends upon tuxpaint-stamps Data is wrong I think. Tuxpaint can be run without the stamps. Binary package hint: tuxpaint tuxpaint-data_0.9.15b-3ubuntu1_all.deb tuxpaint-stamps-default_2005.11.25-1ubuntu2_all.deb tuxpaint-data depends upon tuxpaint-stamps, and vice versa. This means that tuxpaint cannot be installed using gdebi as it will not allow one package to be installed without the other having been previously installed. (I can't test with synaptic as I don't have a linux box with net access) -------- tuxpaint-stamps-default_2005.11.25-1ubuntu2_all.deb depends upon tuxpaint-data (>= 2002.09.25) tuxpaint-data depends upon tuxpaint-stamps Stamps shouldn't depend upon data.
2008-03-08 03:45:26 Caroline Ford title [Edgy]tuxpaint should recommend stamps not depend on them [Edgy]tuxpaint-stamps should not depend upon tuxpaint-data
2008-04-01 18:58:18 Caroline Ford tuxpaint: assignee secretlondon
2008-04-01 19:47:47 Caroline Ford bug added attachment 'tuxpaint_0.9.17-1ubuntu3.debdiff' (tuxpaint_0.9.17-1ubuntu3.debdiff)
2008-04-01 20:18:11 Caroline Ford bug added attachment 'tuxpaint-stamps_2007.07.01-1ubuntu2.debdiff' (tuxpaint-stamps_2007.07.01-1ubuntu2.debdiff)
2008-04-01 20:19:10 Caroline Ford tuxpaint: assignee secretlondon
2008-04-01 20:35:52 Caroline Ford bug added subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors for main
2008-04-02 05:44:46 Daniel Holbach bug added subscriber Oliver Grawert
2008-04-12 11:46:05 Oliver Grawert tuxpaint: status Confirmed Fix Committed
2008-04-12 11:46:05 Oliver Grawert tuxpaint: assignee ogra
2008-04-12 11:46:25 Oliver Grawert tuxpaint: status Fix Committed Fix Released
2009-12-17 13:14:26 Przemek K. tuxpaint (Baltix): status New Fix Released
2009-12-17 13:14:51 Przemek K. tuxpaint (Debian): status New Fix Released
2017-03-23 05:36:22 Mantas Kriaučiūnas bug added subscriber Baltix GNU/Linux system developers
2017-03-23 06:04:28 Mantas Kriaučiūnas tuxpaint (Baltix): importance Undecided Medium
2017-03-23 06:04:28 Mantas Kriaučiūnas tuxpaint (Baltix): status Fix Released Confirmed
2017-03-23 06:04:28 Mantas Kriaučiūnas tuxpaint (Baltix): assignee Mantas Kriaučiūnas (mantas)
2017-03-23 06:05:16 Mantas Kriaučiūnas summary [Edgy]tuxpaint-stamps should not depend upon tuxpaint-data [Xenial] tuxpaint-data should not depend on tuxpaint-stamps
2017-03-23 06:11:41 Mantas Kriaučiūnas description Binary package hint: tuxpaint tuxpaint-data_0.9.15b-3ubuntu1_all.deb tuxpaint-stamps-default_2005.11.25-1ubuntu2_all.deb tuxpaint-data depends upon tuxpaint-stamps, and vice versa. This means that tuxpaint cannot be installed using gdebi as it will not allow one package to be installed without the other having been previously installed. (I can't test with synaptic as I don't have a linux box with net access) -------- tuxpaint-stamps-default_2005.11.25-1ubuntu2_all.deb depends upon tuxpaint-data (>= 2002.09.25) tuxpaint-data depends upon tuxpaint-stamps Stamps shouldn't depend upon data. Binary package hint: tuxpaint-data # dpkg -s tuxpaint-data |grep -i stamp Depends: tuxpaint-stamps-default | tuxpaint-stamps, # apt-get purge tuxpaint-stamps-default The following packages will be REMOVED: tuxpaint* tuxpaint-data* tuxpaint-stamps-default* 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 2 not upgraded. After this operation, 239 MB disk space will be freed. According to comment #16: > I've just chatted on irc to the Debian developer (Ben Armstrong) and our conclusion is: > tuxpaint-stamps should suggest tuxpaint > tuxpaint-data should recommend tuxpaint-stamps > tuxpaint should depend on tuxpaint-data tuxpaint-data depends upon tuxpaint-stamps-default since since 2015 Vivid release. This means that tuxpaint cannot be installed without tuxpaint-stamps-default, see this diff: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/192948246/tuxpaint_1%3A0.9.21-1.1ubuntu1_1%3A0.9.22-1.diff.gz